Right now, our world is facing the biggest and worst threat to peace and individual freedom since the Cold War: Islam. In all parts of the world, non-muslims are being slaughtered, tortured, forced to convert, raped, beaten, burned to death, and slowly assimilated into the cult of muhammad. There are three stages to what is called "jihad," and there are various forms of jihad that are non-violent but just as destructive to life as we know it.
Before continuing or at least as soon as you are done here, I encourage and implore you to familiarize yourself with the world events of today. Don't rely upon mainstream media resources, as they are tightly controlled by islamic forces attempting to conceal what is happening throughout other continents. The best place to start is the Islam Exposed page on Facebook. Other sources would be Jihad Watch, Creeping Sharia (the first to report, and with videos, proof that the 9/11 memorial in PA is, in fact, a large open mosque), Atlas Shrugs, and Bare Naked Islam (to name a few).
So now you know (or will know) the terror cascading down upon this planet by a growing cult of what the media likes to call "extremists." If you do as I suggested, you should know now or will know that there is no such thing as "extremist muslim" and "moderate muslim." Every one under islam is under the instruction of their imams to make this world wholly islamic. "Moderate" muslims are responsible for the grooming and sexual form jihad, setting we, the lambs, up for the slaughter.
I will state emphatically that I am by all definition "pagan." I have no affiliation with religion as I am spiritual and follow no religious laws of mankind. Therefore, I am not biased towards any religion. Likewise, I am not hateful of any religion that does no harm. Islam, to be clear, is not a religion. It is a cult of a clinically insane self-appointed prophet, who took the polytheistic religion of his people and bastardized it to his own vision, filling it with world domination, slaughter of innocents, violence against women, pedophilia, bigotry, and bestiality.
On January 1 of this year, I wrote down the dreams I had the night before and shared them with many of my friends. Each New Year's Eve, I have dreams about the coming year. This has happened to me all of my life, though I never thought to write them down and in my younger years, was made to fear everything about who I was and my abilities (as posted throughout this site). So far, of the 5 events distinctly represented in the night-long dream, only 2 have not come to pass. One of those involves my personal life that, in fact, I am beginning to see unfolding. The other is about the Vatican.
Recently, there has been much talk about the persecutions of various religions by muslim terrorists. Those to suffer the most in America are Christians, as this is a majority Christian country. In Egypt, the Coptic Christians are being slaughtered in the streets by the muslim brotherhood, as the christians are in Kenya, as well. Hindus and Buddhists are being struck down in India and various Asian countries where those two faiths are dominant.
The greatest concentration of concerned comments on articles of islams violent offensive are by Christians fearing this is the "end times" and the persecution of Christianity. Many say the end will never happen because they will fight back, but as of yet, there has been more talking and peaceful protest than any form of effective defense. It's as though there is a force making the world complacent to the new order of islam, somewhat of a drugged state where the person knows what needs to be done and wants to react but can't bring themselves to move. It feels like the dream we have of trying to run from something but our feet or legs are stuck in mud or somehow paralyzed and won't move quickly or not at all, regardless of how hard we try to get away. That's the feeling I sense from the world, and I have questioned myself and the heavens repeatedly why.
In the last few days, with so much disaster befalling my country through our government and the looming islamic threat, I have what you might call "prayed" about this. I have meditated and I have spoken to the powers of heaven with questions and to request the intervention of the inevitable. In response, I received many clues yesterday into the direction of our world and the realization this cannot be stopped.
It seems to be that religion has always only been a temporary thing. Each culture only has their ideology for a set period of time before another makes its grand entrance and overtakes the current dogma. Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Scandinavia, Ireland have all known and held firmly to certain strong religious beliefs, until something changed in the blink of history's eye and the culture became something else almost overnight (in terms of timeline comparison). I am most familiar with the Scandinavian and Catholic predictions of the end of the world, and I can assure you they both are almost one in the same. For religious people, the end of their faith IS the end of the world. The Vikings spoke of the end of the world as the end of their gods, the Ragnarok. We all know the end of the Viking Age didn't end the world, but it did end that spiritual world for them as the majority converted to either Christianity or Judaism. The end of the world for Catholics is very familiar, and I believe it is happening now.
I have been needing to clean my garage and go through/clear out over 30 boxes from our last move. We came here two years ago, but suddenly, yesterday, I felt this need to go through them. I was on my fourth box - making better headway than I expected, tossing things into the trash piles and donation piles - when I found a binder my dad put together about Pope John Paul II's Pilgrimage to the Promised Land and the middle east. I was going to throw it away, to be honest, because I have left catholicism behind and care nothing of what the Vatican "demands" of people. I was pulling out pages, starting with the first, to save the clear plastic sleeves for my daughter's school reports. As I came to the 8th and 9th page, I had this persistent urge to read before I pulled it out. What I saw made me replace the papers I had tossed into the trash pile and later, research the pilgrimage on the internet. After finding several articles by various sources, most of them Catholic and some of them by priests, I was convinced the first thing I suspected when reading the papers in my dad's binder couldn't be wrong. (Photos of the binder are at the bottom of this article.)
The dream I had about the church was as follows: In the Vatican, there was a secret sanctum. Within that room were priests, cardinals, and bishops. I couldn't tell them apart and couldn't say if the pope was among them. They were all dressed in white robes and chanting in a language that was not Italian, Latin, or any language with which I was familiar. I did, however, recognize some of the symbols around the room and on the candles they carried. It was all pagan of some kind. I don't know if I saw exactly what they looked like and maybe I forgot as soon as I woke up, but I can't remember them now and couldn't remember them when I wrote all of this down the morning after the dream. I just know that in the dream, I gasped several times in shock of seeing what I understood to be forbidden pagan images and ceremonies being respectfully represented by these ordained men of the Church in this hidden chamber of the Vatican. Inwardly, I smiled and softly laughed at the satisfaction of being right in my theory that the Vatican and the Catholic Church, itself, were merely disguises for the continuation of pre-Jesus pagan beliefs.
Historically, Rome would conquer a land and distort its culture to suit its own purpose. The most evident of that for us would be the Greek gods and goddesses being changed to represent Rome. When it failed to conquer Israel, even through its destruction of Judea, and its political advisors realized the mythos of Jesus would only grow stronger through his martyrdom, they carefully reconstructed their own religions (which were previously Greek, previously Egyptian, and previously Mesopotamian) and applied them to Jesus to make him into a puppet deity, one they could manufacture for the purpose of becoming "God's Voice" to the people already following him as a messenger of God. They so successfully accomplished the hijacking of Jesus that they managed to change history in the eyes of later Catholic parishioners so that Jews were suddenly responsible for his crucifixion, and since Judaism does not recognize Jesus as anything more than a blessed prophet or wise religious man, Rome was able to secure heavy criticism of Jews and rise up as Jesus' savior and voice, thus successfully conquering Israel as was its initial goal.
In all of my research into the beginnings of the Catholic Church, I couldn't find anything other than "1st century AD". It is a widely held belief among the Church that Jesus Christ formed the Catholic Church with Rome at that time, which we know is impossible since
A. Jesus was dead before Rome even acknowledged the legitimacy of his fellowship, and
B. It was Rome that arrested, persecuted, tortured, and finally killed Jesus and his disciples.
The best guess I can give about the true origin of the Catholic Church was sometime after the Council of Nicea and possibly 100 years later after the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Think of it like this: If the Roman Empire was only approximately 1500 years old at the time of its fall, and its beginning was pagan in origin, the Roman Catholic Church could not possibly have begun with Jesus. Christianity began with Jesus and was claimed by Rome as a tactic of war.
Emperor Constantine came into power almost 300 years after the death of Jesus and wanted to unify the religions in a vain attempt to place Rome as the leader of the world. The interesting aspect here is that Constantine was a pagan, himself, and contrary to popular Christian belief, did not convert freely on his death bed.
I have read and re-read every article I could find regarding this and written by Catholics and non-Catholics. Believe me, the contradictions and volume of various versions will make your head spin like Linda Blair! So ... I took to another route: Geography and Archaeology. I studied the history of the countries and cultures and people of the time. In conclusion, I found that although Constantine pushed for a unified world under Rome's rule and Christianity as its ruling religion, he insisted upon letting the pagan religions remain as they were, untouched and unharmed by any Christian leader.
Due to the concerns of both the Pagans (who distrusted the Christians because of their secret ways) and the Christians (who distrusted the Pagans because of their refusal to end polytheism), Constantine formally recognized Christianity and legalized it so it could be expressed openly and out of the shadows of speculation and suspicion. Tensions eased outside of the chamber walls among the people, but within was a brewing intolerance of how the religions were being handled. In the end, Constantine was accused of kowtowing to the majority Christian leaders because it appeared to his Pagan subjects that the Christian ways were being allowed to dominate the Pagan ones. On the contrary, they misunderstood his master plan.
EXAMPLES:
- Holy days of pagans became holy days of Christians in his attempt to assimilate all the people under one doctrine. He and bishops after him took significant events of the new Christian faith and applied them to pre-existing pagan days of worship. Even pagan deities were given a facelift and were applied to important figures in the Church.
- Par exemple: most of the story of Jesus was embellished with what Rome knew of Greek, Egyptian, and Mesopotamian gods and heroes. The star was a comet long recorded throughout history and held among pagans to herald in change and a new leader or messenger of the gods. I've previously posted about St. Patrick being changed from the Vatican-sanctioned terrorist to a reincarnation of the Egyptian god, Osiris.
- Winter Solstice became Christmas - Yule is the celebration of the birth of the sun god. Historical texts puts the time of Jesus' birth as in the Spring months of the ME
- Spring Solstice became Easter - This is the celebration of Oester, the rabbit-headed goddess, and represents new birth, eggs, and rabbits. Many pagan traditions surrounding the Spring Equinox involve a god rising from the dead or ashes or the underworld
- Summer Solstice became the Solemnity of Saints and Ascension of Mary - celebrated with the crowning of Mary with a floral wreath as the pagan tradition is the May Pole and making head wreaths of flowers for maidens.
- Autumn Solstice became All Soul's Day - traditionally a summer event, moved to coincide with Samhain, the third of three harvest festivals to pagans
- Within the Vatican's walls are pagan temples, pagan monuments, and references to pagan gods and goddesses, all from Egypt, Mesopotamia, Scandinavia, Greece, and Druidism. When asked about these sites, the Vatican refuses to answer and claims only that they remain for historical and architectural significance. Yet, even the pope's vestments and staff are pagan in origin and bear distinct and important pagan symbols (Druid and Mesopotamian).
- The pinecone garden and pinecones throughout the grounds and carved into the Papal Staff represent the Sumarian worship of the third eye, or pineal gland. There are, also, four real Egyptian Obelisks in Vatican City and the lions of Mesopotamian goddess Inanna (Ishtar to the Arabs). The triquetra began as German and represented Odin, then was taken by the Celtic Christians to represent the holy trinity.
Before Constantine's First Council of Nicea, there was a bishop named Arius. Arius was often chastised by those Christians who demanded acknowledgement of Jesus being God's son and part of the Holy Trinity because his theology came from pre-Christ days of only one God and no son deity. He was Christian but didn't see Jesus as being God - if that makes sense. He believed that in the biblical texts, there makes a clear note that there is only one God who is forever lasting, no beginning and no end. His conclusion was that Jesus was not the son of God and the Holy Trinity was wrong because if God did have a son, and Jesus was God as part of the Trinity, then it is an end and Jesus came from nothing. His words created a great controversy that resulted in the creation of the ecumenical council, the first of the seven was the First Council of Nicea.
"..if the Father begat the Son, he that was begotten had a beginning of existence: and from this it is evident, that there was a time when the Son was not. It therefore necessarily follows, that he [the Son] had his substance from nothing." ~ "The Dispute of Arus with Alexander, his Bishop." The Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates Scholasticus
Because he declared that God was finite rather than an infinte being, he and his fellow priests and bishops believing as he did were exiled.
What is interesting about him is that he often chastised the way Constantine and the other bishops were allowing Greek Pagan worship to not only continue but to mix in with the new Christian Church. His declarations at the Council of Nicea were simply the last straw. At some point, Arius lived in the Roman conquered territory of the former Judea, which was renamed in the year 135 by Roman Emperor Hadrian to "Palestine," further ensuring the ownership of the previously Isreal-held land of Judea.
Several years after the exile, Constantine forgave the crimes of Arius and his followers and invited them back into the fold, with the condition they would recant their controversial beliefs and put it in writing. Many did not like this and Bishop Alexander with whom Arius fought constantly regarding their differing beliefs wrote that he prayed for the death of Arius before he could reach his appointment back into Alexander's court, as per Constantine's orders. Mysteriously, Arius did die and the Christian people credited his strange death as a miracle of God smiting a heretic. Later evidence paved the way for strong speculation that he was poisoned.
There are several interesting factors I've shown you so far, not the least of which was Rome's obsessive connection to Palestine. This will be important in a moment as I return the message back to my father's keepsake book of the Pope's holy pilgrimage.
During his stop in the Middle East, Pope John Paul II said this:
Dear Friends, I am fully aware of the great challenges facing the Palestinian Authority and People in every field of economic and cultural development. In a particular way, my payers are with those Palestinians - Muslims and Christian - who are still without a home of their own, their proper place in society and the possibility of a normal working life. My hope is that my visit today to the Deheisha Refugee Camp will serve to remind the international community that decisive action is needed to improve the situation of the Palestinian people. I was particularly pleased at the unanimous acceptance by the United Nations of the Resolution of Bethlehem 2000, which commits the international community to help in developing this area and in improving conditions of peace and reconciliation in one of the most cherished and significant places on earth. The promise of peace made at Bethlehem will become a reality for he world only when the dignity and rights of all human beings made in the image of God are acknowledged and respected. Today and always the Palestinian people are in my prayers to the One who holds the destiny of the world in his hands. May the Most High God enlighten, sustain and guide in the path of peace the whole Palestinian people."
Before his visit, the Vatican formed an agreement with the Palestinians which contained criticism of Israel's hold over all of Jerusalem, including Arab East Jerusalem. It is impossible to miss the clear anti-semitism of the Vatican and the transparent support of Palestine and Muslims. Palestine was first, conquered Israeli land of Rome, then it became muslim territory. Rome is still attacking Isreal through manipulation and outward verbal support of muslims, the same people now slaughtering those christian palestianians the pope spoke so highly of in 2000.
 |
| Here, Pope John Paul II kisses a gifted kuran. Click on the photo to read a sickening blog of support for his actions by a priest, who says the Pope did the right thing in his effort to show peace and love to his fellow man. |
I woke up this morning still getting the feeling this is the tip of the iceberg, that there is so much more I urgently have to discover. I hopped online and looked up "Third Secret of Fatima." I don't know why I did that. I just felt the need. I haven't given much thought to the whole Fatima event since my childhood watching the movie about it every year in Catholic school. There was no logical reason I would wake up and have the burning desire to read about it, much less find out about the third secret specifically.
Now, don't laugh but I like watching the show "Ancient Aliens." I'm open to a lot of possibilities in the universe, though I do so with one foot planted firmly in the sand of skepticism. Still, if you look past the ancient astronaut theories, a good bit of the series teaches a lot on geography, archaeology, theology, anthropology, world events, and even sociology and psychology (if you know what you're looking for). I keep my iPad open to the internet as I watch, and when some new territory comes up, a new continent, an historical event, or a name, I immediately look it up and research it to death. One of the episodes dealt with the miracle at Fatima (of course, it was aliens, not the virgin Mary .. *wink*). The episode was some time ago and I had forgotten about it until I stumbled upon references to it in my search this morning. That's when I remembered about the controversy surrounding the Pope's decision to reveal the secret to the public, a controversy I didn't know existed until that episode aired. So, when I remembered, that was the first thing I looked up.
And we saw in an immense light that is God: `something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White, `we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions.From what I found, it seems that although Lucia revealed the secret to those she was told to, she was reluctant to share it until after 1960. She said she felt no one would understand until then. Pope John Paul II decided to reveal this secret in May of 2000, just after his holy pilgrimage. It has been said by people near the Pope as he was interviewed about the third secret that Lucia, standing in attendance, seemed uncomfortable and unhappy about his words. She didn't say much and refused to comment on the Vatican's interpretation of the secret.
It has been officially declared by the Vatican that the third secret pertained to the assassination attempt on the Pope in 1981. Historians and theologians alike have had trouble explaining how an assassination attempt could bring forth the end of the world, and many scholars have had mixed feelings on the validity of the Pope's words, most of whom are Catholic and feel that by not believing the Pope is akin to treason against the Church and blasphemy against God. Still, one must wonder why Lucia seemed nervous and unhappy about the revelation considering the other two secrets were allowed to be revealed since they had already occurred. If this was a prediction that had already passed, as well, and was accurately translated, what would be the harm? Unless it wasn't accurate and had not yet come to pass.
In May of 1994 -- 77 years after Our Lady first appeared to the three children at Fatima, Portugal -- a French priest was listening to a CD entitled "Mysterium Fidei," with French lyrics and sung by French choirs. As he was listening devoutly, suddenly the music faded into the background and a clear voice, which was perceived quite normally and not as an interior inspiration, said: "L'eglise saignera de toutes ses plaies", that is, "The Church will bleed from all her wounds."
Then, there followed this text:
There will be a wicked council planned and prepared that will change the countenance of the Church. Many will lose the Faith; confusion will reign everywhere. The sheep will search for their shepherds in vain.
A schism will tear apart the holy tunic of My Son. This will be the end of times, foretold in the Holy Scriptures and recalled to memory by Me in many places. The abomination of abominations will reach its peak and it will bring the chastisement announced at La Salette. My Son's arm, which I will not be able to hold back anymore, will punish this poor world, which must expiate its crimes.
One will only speak about wars and revolutions. The elements of nature will be unchained and will cause anguish even among the best (the most courageous). The Church will bleed from all Her wounds. Happy are they who will persevere and search for refuge in My Heart, because in the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph. ~Quoted from novusordowatch.org
Keep in mind that Lucia believed she could not reveal the secret until after 1960. 1962 was the year of Vatican II, which many Catholics at the time vehemently opposed, citing the drastic directional change from the original formula set out by the seven parts of the ecumenical council and reaffirmed by Vatican I. If this vision is the real secret, it would be a prediction of the fall of the Catholic Church and/or Rome and would finally help to assemble the puzzle of questionable events that have taken place under Rome in the last 50 years.
One does not have to believe in the Miracle of Fatima to understand that Rome believes in it. And if Rome believes it is destined to fall under its current Catholic/Christian order, it will do as it has always done to survive: Adapt to a new religion through manipulation and eventual domination.
What we have right now as the facts are laid out:
1. Rome took Judea and later bargained with Muslim Arabs for what Rome declared "Palestine" to wipe away any trait of Israel from its ownership.
2. Rome was multicultural until Constantine's death and a more strict, Christian adherence was obtained, notably under the heading of Catholicism.
3. A supposed prediction made by the mother of God suggested the fall of the Church, and regardless of which version was true, the Pope was in both and the Pope is representative of the Catholic Church.
4. Since the 1960's, Rome has had an odd friendship with muslim countries.
5. Historical evidence shows that Hitler had a very close connection with the Vatican and was visited more than once by the Pope during the holocaust.
6. During his 2000 pilgrimage, the Pope refused to acknowledge Israel's ownership of the Palestine territory and failed to even acknowledge Israel when speaking of his wishes of peace in and around Palestine. He only spoke of his well-wishes towards muslims and regional christians (although he could see that even in 2000, muslims were on a religious jihad against Christians as well as Jews).
It is speculated that the third secret from Fatima is why Pope Benedict suddenly stepped down from his seat in February of this year. He refused to give a straight answer for departing, only stating it was for health but no prior issues had ever been recorded. It is, also, speculated that he was ordered from the seat by the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (formerly Knights of Malta), which holds permanent observer status at the UN, has its own sovereignty, its own passports, its own training, its own medical services, and is considered a powerful force behind the Vatican. It happened to be in February of this year, just before Pope Benedict's surprising announcement, that the order celebrated its 900 year anniversary. This order fought against the muslims for generations in various forms, including the Knights Templar and the Freemasons.
Putting together all of this knowledge and what is happening currently with islam, I cannot help but wonder if this is the pre-designed end of the Roman Catholic Church.
I can clearly see the contradiction in the influence of the Order of Malta over Rome while it appears Rome has been in secret alliance with first Nazi Germany and then islam - both anti-semite factions bent on exterminating the Jews. If the Knights are violent opponents of islam, what's going on?
I found something interesting in my research. There is a series of papal predictions by a monk in 1595. The list (called "Prophecy of the Popes") begins in 1143 and concludes to the final (unnamed) Pope, signaling the end of the Catholic Church. There are 112 in total. Some people question the validity, suggesting there was a self-serving agenda in its creation. Others are adamant that not only is the list real, they can, also, easily find the connection, in order, to each Pope. You can read for yourself and conclude what you wish.
If this list is true, I can't help but wonder if this has influenced the Vatican since Vatican II. It would explain their sudden support of islam as was always the custom of Rome. It would explain why Vatican II was created and immediately began changing traditions. It would explain why Pope Benedict was fired after he had been declaring his intent to re-establish the old ways prior to Vatican II. If this is to be the end of the Roman Catholic Church, Rome has to establish itself right now as a friend of islam so it can, at some point, take over as it has always done to conquered religions.
What I cannot seem to work out is why the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, with their history of violent retaliation against islam, would not only condone this movement but help to make it possible by firing the one Pope who intended to bring back the Church to the way the Knights wanted it to be. Unless they believe in the Third Secret so much that they know this is the end of the Catholic Church and are the determining force behind the plot to first befriend then conquer islam from within so it can be, once again, the religious seat of the world.
One thing you must know about the Order of Malta is that they are very devout followers of the Virgin Mary. They invoke her at every meeting and hold to her as a patroness and spiritual intercessor. Therefore, anything revealed about her at Fatima would be the epitome of spiritual guidance and religious doctrine to them. If they interpreted her final secret as others have and concluded that the Roman Catholic Church IS going to end very soon, and if they believe in the Prophecy of the Popes and put that list together with the Third Secret, the only recourse left for them would be to play the game of Risk and allow the cult of mohammad to win so that Rome may take its place as first, advisors, and then, conquerers and once more rulers of the world.
If all this doesn't make you ask the appropriate questions or feel anything dubious is going on, I think this might just change your mind - and it's only one of many:
LONG ISLAND CATHOLIC SCHOOL TRADES BLAZERS FOR BURQAS (CLICK)
In classrooms where Catholic girls once studied the Bible and prayed the Our Father, young Muslims now study the Quran and pray in Arabic (“Death to America?”). The girls no longer wear uniforms with blazers, but traditional Muslim floor-length dresses called jilbabs, with hijabs covering their heads. (continued....)
One final note: I have worked on this since 8:00 this morning. It is now 2:33 in the afternoon. I'll take a break and return later with a clear, more organized mind to edit any typos or other mistakes. I'm telling you this because I don't take any of this lightly. I have no room or tolerance for ignorance by choice, and I don't like it when people pass of their own agenda as fact.
I make every effort to be as accurate as possible. I research everything I write thoroughly before I even put pen to paper (so-to-speak). I open books and notebooks, scour the internet and watch documentaries on TV, and I leave no point-of-view unexplored. I take notes for everything, whether I agree with it or not. My opinion doesn't matter if what I learn to the contrary is fact. When I begin writing, I constantly refer back to those sources to be sure I'm not making any critical mistakes. This is how I have done things for the last 10 years of my spiritual journey. I was lied to and manipulated for 30 years as a Catholic. I won't live any more lies and I won't guide others to do so, either.
You can call my words conjecture, theory, postulation .. As long as it makes you think, reason, and seek the answers for yourself, even if you seek only to prove me wrong.
Below are the online sources I used for this post. I agree that Wikipedia, which I used quite a bit, isn't always the most reliable source for accurate reporting; however, I NEVER leave my education to Wikipedia alone. I refer to the footnotes and follow the links to the original sites. In this case, I visited so many sites in a spider web-like scavenger hunt on this topic that posting all of the links could even be longer than this actual post. I'll refer to the article and you can have the freedom of seeking out each of the separate sources yourself. It's enlightening, believe me. Mentally invigorating.
Other sources are questionable, I will admit, but again, I didn't leave their word as the end-all. I looked up what they had to say and when satisfied that the parts I would focus on for this article were authenticated by various other sources, I continued. Even if I may doubt a source, I read all they have to say for the psychology behind their words. I want to know WHY they are saying what they are saying, right or wrong. As I've said, I was manipulated for 30 years by religion. I'm not eager to have it happen again.
http://archive.adl.org/interfaith/JohnPaul_II_Visit.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius#cite_note-11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecumenical_council
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Constantinople
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Catholic_Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Vatican_Council
http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/cathnews/fatima/popesecr.html
http://exonews.org/38670/
http://www.novusordowatch.org/thirdsecret.htm#.Ukq0VmRoQ78
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
PHOTOS OF MY DAD'S BINDER
The website seems to no longer exist. Click on each and it will become large enough to read.
I only photographed samples relevant to this article. Although the majority of the binder would be considered important, there are 160 pages. I can take photos if necessary, but not to share on this post as the volume of images would be overwhelming.
I only photographed samples relevant to this article. Although the majority of the binder would be considered important, there are 160 pages. I can take photos if necessary, but not to share on this post as the volume of images would be overwhelming.
No comments:
Post a Comment